I don’t feel a dehumanizing effect in this community – quite the opposite. This community is positive, supportive, and overall a wonderful place to be.
However, on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, etc. it seems like the loudest voices get the most attention, already-marginalized people are put down and treated like garbage, and people say horrible things they would never say in real life (or maybe they would).
Is social media dehumanizing us? Is it bringing out the best, or the worst, in humanity? What can we do to improve social media?
I think it is a tool and it can be as positive as toxic. Great platforms host communities and open doors. It is mainly used to connect people so if it serves this purpose I don’t think it is dehumanizing us. Used properly it is very good to be able to connect with everyone, to practice argumentation skills, to express our opinions on different topics. Once feelings of jealousy, hatred start to arise from some platform, I think we need to take a step back.
Personally, I dont think it has ever had any bad impact. Looking forward to know the others’ opinions.
@David & I had a one-hour long conversation the other day on this topic that we recorded, which we might or might not release in the future.
My answer is no. Social Media amplifies the worst of humanity but also elevates the best of it. It is a true, albeit slightly distorted, reflection of us as a species. We are only as good as the internet we create.
There is a disconnect between what people would do behind the keyboard vs. what they would do “in real life” for sure. But I’m not sure which one is closer to “the truth”. For example, if you only comment the most racist things online to certain groups of people under a pseudo name, yet in real life you would never utter such thing, to me you are still a racist. The internet does not dehumanize you, it reveals aspects of who you are that’s otherwise unknown.
I think quite a few recent terrorist acts, like the Christchurch massacre, were inspired by groups the attacker found online. Even if they didn’t tell him explicitly to do what he did, they galvanized him. They reinforced his beliefs. They made him feel justified.
That’s fucking terrifying.
I’m glad y’all mentioned this, because I was thinking it as soon as I posted the thread: social media is really just a (distorted) reflection of human nature.
That’s downright profound @linh…you should tweet that!
I’d have to agree here. Ultimately, we have to change as humans before we can expect our creations to follow suit.
Some looks for scapegoats, others look for conspiracies, but this much is clear; violence breeds violence, repression brings retaliation, and only a cleaning of our whole society can remove this sickness from our soul.
Everything have some positive as well as negative impacts. its depends on how one can use it. Social Media also have some positive and negative impacts but it depends on you that how you want to use it. you can share and discuss your queries and hopefully getting some good answers from people who have expertise in that field so you are able to reach them easily with social media.
People not only say bad things but you also give appreciations if your work is useful and giving some some good information to the society.
Sometimes, the problem is the solution… but when it is, the social network gets larger.
“The demonstrations were carried out in response to the introduction of Facebook’s ‘News Feed’ and ‘Mini-Feed’ pages which greeted users upon signing in and presented a wealth of information about their friends and their online activities, seemingly without any form of privacy control. The pages even listed details of personal relationships and sexual orientations; both highly contentious issues. The response to this perceived intrusion on users’ privacy was staggering. Groups were set up overnight to pillory the Facebook News Feed, massive petitions that numbered hundreds of thousands were set up across international boundaries, online blogs and message boards became filled with incandescent comments.
Eventually, Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook’s founder and himself a former Harvard student) was forced to issue a public apology and then amend the News Feed to allow users the opportunity to edit their privacy settings. No longer would such information be so publicly accessible. No longer would privacy be taken so lightly. The student body used the very means by which they were being surveilled (that is, the cyber-synoptic infrastructure of the Facebook network) to organize an internationally resistant movement to support their right to privacy. This confrontation provides an engrossing example of the World Wide Web being used as a powerful tool to mobilize many bodies against a perceived force of oppression and subjugation. This was a clear demonstration that the politics of surveillance (Haggerty 2006) and the politics of the self matter greatly in present climes; where issues of privacy and the sanctity of the virtual realm are never far from the headlines. As such, it provides an excellent empirical backdrop to a conceptual analysis of resistance-through-distance and resistance-through-persistence (Collinson 1994) in the virtual realm.”