I am Jeff Atwood (@codinghorror), co-founder of Stack Overflow and Discourse. Ask me anything! 4/8 @ Noon PST


Generally… poor.

Now that we’re profitable at Discourse, every year we do try to give back to the open source ecosystem that Discourse is a part of and benefits from. This is a manual process of us identifying what dependencies we have, how much we rely on them, and then tracking down a way to send them the money.

A centralized service that offers one stop shopping here, a directory of open source projects with an easy one-click way to send a bunch of them money would be awesome though – and maybe the first significant step in that direction?

How can we reduce friction, and make it as easy as possible to hand money to {x} different open source projects at once?


Companies that use automated systems often shrug off responsibility for the behavior and potential user consequences of those systems.

It seems that a lot of developers believe that if they were not explicitly intending for particular aspects of the system to discriminate or mistreat then they are not responsible for the behavior.

How do you think we can best bring forward issues of complex potentially discriminatory system behavior especially among companies that make use of closed source systems with minimal oversight?

1 Like

Jeff, thanks so much for your expert perspective on this! James

1 Like

Good question… I feel like chat was one of the last frontiers where the good replacements took far too long to appear.

If you consider that Discord’s main innovation was moving something like TeamSpeak, which had a terrible UI and was very difficult to set up, into the ease of a one-click browser URL link… my intuition is that with WebAssembly people start building even more ambitious apps with the browser.


This resonates with me deeply as a woman in tech. Thank you for mentioning it.


A lot less people blog regularly, and there’s a zillion alternatives to blogging, including pervasive social media. If you just want “a web presence” then the zero friction way is to create a Twitter or Facebook / Instagram page. It pains me to say this but the era of the blog is probably over.

That said, there’s still a lot to be personally gained by putting your research journal on the web (as a blog or anything else you prefer), like I did back in 2004, and seeing what happens. You can link to it, you have a record of what you were working on, and interested people can find it over time. It still works!


I do not. I’m not sure “artificial intelligence” is a particularly useful concept at this time. “machine learning” is at least a little more accurate in describing where we are :wink:


The main challenge is that you’re asking people to create an account and sign in to the community site before posting. I view this as a helpful barrier that prevents low-value drive-by commenting:



Has IBM died yet?

1 Like

Hey Jeff @codinghorror! If you have one, what’s one of your favorite questions or interactions you’ve seen on Stack Overflow?


I subscribe to the “three things” philosophy.

When it comes to software, I generally practice complaint driven development, and for Discourse we always favor aggregate feedback from active communities over random opinions.

Right now, I’m thinking how we can make Discourse better for Q&A and AMA (Ask Me Anything) type activities since that’s what we’re doing :thinking:


Don’t start a really big project. Start a small project and iterate on it with your users to make it big.


Oh this one is close to my :heart: but let me invoke this


Have you seen the movie “Inside Out” by Pixar? Discourse is like your long term memory, so it is quite complementary to the short-term memory of chat.

That said, for very small communities of less than 5 people, or if you have really low usage, honestly a Slack or Discord will work better.

Once you have “enough” people participating over time, you will likely want the searchability, organization, and long term memory of a Discourse instance. And remember, we are 100% free and open source, forever!


So true @codinghorror. People surely seem to prefer hot takes on social media over long-form blogging. Fun fact though: long-form posts perform a lot better on @hackernoon than shorter ones. We will strive to forever be a place for deep tech expertise rather than hottest news.

1 Like

I think amplification of words online is maybe part of the current problem, not the solution. White supremacy, for example, shouldn’t be amplified, nor should hatemongers like Alex Jones.

Freedom of Speech ≠ Freedom of Reach

There’s been excellent progress in this area over the last couple years from the big players like Twitter and Facebook so I’m encouraged we can continue to improve here.


Hi Jeff,

first of all, thank you for your work for the greater good of the internet communities. Sharing knowledge and laughs would not be as easy, nor as fun without the work you have done.

As for my question, I am wondering if you have some tips on how to grow an evening side-project into a viable business one would be able to live off. I’m not aiming for the unicorn buyout here, just a paycheck. The business centres around collecting data from companies regarding municipal reporting.



For Stack Overflow the big marketing push was Joel Spolsky and I being mini-famous within the programming niche, so we effectively cheated there.

We advise Discourse communities all the time on “how do I get famous” – there’s no getting around the central requirement of regularly creating great, interesting content that people enjoy. I’ve summarized some of my best advice at

I guess my main advice is to live in your own creation alongside your users, and eat your own dogfood. Try to feel your customers pain by … being the customer!


Honestly the best thing here is for people to write about the problems and publicize them widely. It works. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, especially if they have the higher moral ground of protecting underrepresented groups.

One of the central problems is this:

The problem is that Twitter and Facebook aim to be discussion platforms for “everyone”, where every person, no matter how hateful and crazy they may be, gets a turn on the microphone. They get to be heard.

Being able to close your community door on problematic members, rather than insisting “everyone” gets a seat at the table, is a critical first step. Everything else follows from that.


Well, you can’t go wrong with Cthulhu :rofl:


4421 upvotes currently!


Hello Jeff. Thank you for this AMA. I would like to ask that what do you think about the communication skills of software developers’ as a founder of stackoverflow and discourse? What’s the weaknesses of developers? What do you think? What would you suggest us?